[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: copy on write

To: jecel@lsi.usp.br
Subject: Re: copy on write
From: I.R.Woollard@bnr.co.uk
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 94 10:46:23 BST
Cc: self-interest@otis.Stanford.EDU
In-reply-to: <9404041510.AA08209@lsi.usp.br> (jecel@lsi.usp.br)
Resent-date: Tue, 5 Apr 94 10:46:23 BST
Resent-from: Bay.Chang@Eng.Sun.COM (Bay-Wei Chang [CONTRACTOR])
Resent-message-id: <9404052152.AA20771@traits.Eng.Sun.COM>
Resent-to: real-self-interest@self.stanford.edu

>> perhaps easier to read is:
>> 
>> "new point"
>
>The problem with this is that we are back where we started: you are
>more likely to accidently omit a word rather than add one. Omitting
>"new" in your suggestion is as bad as forgetting "copy" now.

Nonsense. The suggested mechanism means that globals need no longer be
a parent slot of lobby. Omitting "new" gets you an error.

-Ian

'In cyberspace nobody can hear you ook'

References:
- copy on write
  - From: jecel@lsi.usp.br (Jecel Mattos de Assumpcao Jr.)

Prev by Date: copy on write
Next by Date: Re: Newbie seeks a NeXT version of self
Previous by thread: copy on write
Next by thread: Re: copy on write
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread